19/06/2015 - Enhanced quick reply.

tn5421 wrote

If you want it to ignore something that it thinks is code but isn't code, you have to click somewhere on the page to make the dialogue box go away.

You can just press space and the dialog box will go away.

tn5421 wrote

Says the person that ninja-fixed it to do that when it wasn't doing that before.

I did no such thing. :scream:

tn5421 wrote

Das not tru <3 sillyface is being silly again~

pls. you're making me cry ;-;

Equinox wrote

test

You should make it so that variables autocomplete or show recommendations as well, prime example being when it shows the size tag, it doesn't autocomplete or even show some recommendations for the size variable.

I'll look into it, but it's not a massive priority.

How about line numbers, we all love those, right?

I actually disabled them, because I figured it'd just confuse people that don't code. (but I might have a settings page for the editor, so that people can enable/disable cool features like that).

Also, it'd be pretty cool to have some sort of auto correct feature or be able to have a toggle between "editor mode" and "pure quick reply".

I'll consider it (the toggle between raw and editor), it wouldn't be too hard either, as the old editor is still there, but hidden - duplicating the content in the "enchanced editor", so that it submits.

(and possibly add some padding to .ace_content, 5px maybe?)

I think there's an Ace setting for this, I'll look into it.

I don't know, just throwing ideas. I'm gay for this feature, though. I think it's pretty fokin' neato.

They're good ideas, especially since there's still a lot of work to be done on it.

EDIT:

Pretty buggy after you post, you should make it clear,

Yeah, I should've checked that. It's a relatively easy fix though.

and once you post, clicking on the editor fucks scrolling anally.

I'll look into it. :smile:

Also, the face when no enhanced editor on the edit functionality as well.

I might leave it out of that for now, seeing as the quick reply is far from complete.

Lokorfi wrote

When we use @ to tag someone, maybe there should be suggestions for that too.

I'll look into it.